"IN THE KNOW": The Retaliation and Harassment Continues After the Shooting

"IN THE KNOW": The Retaliation and Harassment Continues After the Shooting

"IN THE KNOW": Mr. Benitez answered a knock at the door to find a gunman, Francisco Perez, waiting for him.

"IN THE KNOW": Mr. Benitez answered a knock at the door to find a gunman, Francisco Perez, waiting for him.

"IN THE KNOW": With Del Mar doing nothing, the campaign against Mr. Benitez and Ms. Lopez took a shocking and horrific turn.

"IN THE KNOW": With Del Mar doing nothing, the campaign against Mr. Benitez and Ms. Lopez took a shocking and horrific turn.

10 Million in Gold!

Laparra.com is for sale $3,900.00.
To buy this domain name call 1-866-866-2700

WOW!

THATS A LOT TO SWALLOW!!!!!!!!!

Nueces De La Parra

10 Million in Gold!

Cash not accepted except in 2:1 ratio.

CALL US at 10, 2 or 4

Serious Inquiries only

You got my number.

"IN THE KNOW": Does John Kelly Wanna be "IN THE KNOW"? "We Know, We're From Here"

"IN THE KNOW": Does John Kelly Wanna be "IN THE KNOW"? "We Know, We're From Here"

EL Defenzor.net: Why are the lights of the harbor bridge turned of as texwrite wrote does this make common sense?

EL Defenzor.net: Why are the lights of the harbor bridge turned of as texwrite wrote does this make common sense?

EL Defenzor.net: Why are the lights of the harbor bridge turned of as texwrite wrote does this make common sense?

does this make common sense?
Posted on June 1, 2006 at 00:15:31 AM by dannoynted1

Take a deep breath Cato...
5/31/2006 10:38 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Certainly things can get done the way they are now. I heard that the port could operate more efficiently if they had a way to accomodate larger ships. Supertankers wouldn't have to offload in the gulf onto other ships and have them deliver it. It would be faster if they brought it in themselves. This is only one issue for the bridge.

Realistically, we won't have a say in the construction of the new bridge. Bigger people than us will make the decision regardless. In other words, I'm sure someone's pockets are going to benefit from it. I hate to say it Cato, I don't think Rock drilling will be the one.

----------------------------------------and just how could you possibly know who will benefit?

is your pocket being lined?

i am sure you have no "common sense" much less know anything about it

when you get some then maybe you can get a "piece of the rock"


`````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````



Two reasons cited for tearing down a historical landmark....
Posted on June 1, 2006 at 00:56:42 AM by Jaime Kenedeno

and notice neither of them deal with who will be making bucoooos of dinero.

Corrosion?

Not a factor for at leat another 50 years or so and that is if we stopped all maintainence. Think it will still be standing after a major hurricane?

I say yes.

Height??

Why height?

How is it better to bring the ship all the way in than to offload away from the public. Public Safety must be a primary factor. These ships are clumsy at best. Let us not forget the Super Tanker Exxon Valdez.

Bottom line is Social Status & Economic status of a select few at the expense of taxpayer money and our safety.

Oh yeah, when we built cargo dock 1 it was designed for industry not parties and board rooms.


`````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````

CENSORSHIP: Good grief, did we hit a nerve?
Posted on June 1, 2006 at 00:43:40 AM by Jaime 4 TEXWRITES

texwrites
Posts: 321

Censorship Here
6/1/2006 12:31 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wowee My post about getting the bridge declared an historical landmark has been purged. This topic shows 16 posts and now only 9 remain. Good grief, did we hit a nerve? I was trying humor and someone thought it had possibilities I guess. How troubling that something like that would get the ax.

`````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````

Re(1): CENSORSHIP: Good grief, did we hit a nerve?
Posted on June 1, 2006 at 00:44:46 AM by Jaime 4 CATO

Cato
Posts: 135
Some support the harbor bridge to get rich, not for community
6/1/2006 12:46 AM

Why are the lights of the harbor bridge turned of as textwrite wrote, to make it less attractive?

The guy (engineer) that built the harbor bridge led the project to built mount Rushmore. The bridge like the courthouse is a historical site.

`````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````

censor capitan? does this make common sense?
Posted on June 1, 2006 at 00:26:30 AM by dannoynted1

what say you capitan?

all jaimes posts were once again deleted by that hater talk radio wannabe american

guess he cant stand those ice cold showers

he even deleted johnseys posts!
why?
he has no common sense!


`````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````

Two things that threaten the Corporate Welfare beneficiaries.....
Posted on June 1, 2006 at 00:38:53 AM by Jaime Kenedeno

1) A movement against building a new bridge and tearing down a historical landmark residing in a historical designated area. Public Opinion can over rule imminent domain.

2)A challenge to the incumbent Gene Seaman to debate his well respected opponent Desert Storm Aviator Juan Garcia.

The Agenda is clear.

Where do you stand El Capitan?

It just goes to demonstrate the cowardice of some and the selective nature of others when it comes to our constitution.

A Sea Man or a Desert Storm Aviator

We dont need your message board or KEYS Radio.

WATT happened to the Skatepark????

Wednesday, May 31, 2006
Yes sir ocifer we were trying to buy a baby and we paid for it, but she did not produce the product and we want our money back
""The judge denied bond for 24-year-old Belinda Ramirez saying she's a flight risk, and a danger to the community".

=====================================================================================

"Packages were found at the defendants house with addresses matching the victims who sent her money and gifts...I saw video surveillance of her using the gift cards at Wal-Mart""



Now, a few red flags pop up in my mind.

First of all if something sounds too good to be true then.......

Secondly and more so this reminds ME of an illegal transaction (like say human trafficking) gone bad and one of the parties reports it to the authorities.

"However, there are some basic elements of trafficking that are widely agreed upon, such as violence, deception, coercion, deprivations of freedom of movement, abuse of authority, debt bondage, forced labour and slavery-like practices, and other forms of exploitation or use of force.

The above elements are largely and commonly agreed upon, and trafficking is considered to be a violation of the basic rights of women and girls. The issue however, gets mired in controversy and confusion when prostitution too is considered as a violation of the basic human rights of both adult women and minors, and equal to sexual exploitation per se. From this standpoint then, trafficking and prostitution become conflated with each other. This conflation is also historically grounded. It is important to remember that the historical understanding of trafficking in international law has been focussed primarily on the movement of women and girls across borders for the purpose of prostitution. This is indeed the key aspect of the 1949 Convention on the Suppression of Traffic in Person and the Exploitation of Others which declares that the very entry of a woman into prostitution with or without her consent, and third party involvement is an offence.
"there is a growing agreement that the problem of 'trafficking in human beings' involves two key elements: recruitment/transport and forced labor or slavery-like practices (actual or attempted) ... Moreover, most experts agree that trafficking should be defined as involving deception or coercion of some kind."

Yes sir ocifer we were trying to buy a baby and we paid for it, but she did not produce the product and we want our money back.

Deception is common in the black market and when attorneys and adoption agencies are circumvented; the players (now illegally conspiring to traffic or sell a human being) become dealers and consumers in the Black Market. High risks and lucrative returns but most of all any contract is void when it violates Statutory Law.

Basically, the courts will not get involved in any suit that involves illegality or immorality.

Therefore, fraud would be based on a legal agreement between two parties. In this case the agreement involved an illegal transaction since it is illegal to buy sell or trade human beings. In the Belinda Ramirez case, she was not obligated to produce a baby in return unless there is a contract agreement in which Laura Valois' Attorney and Adoption Agency would have required. Undoubtedly, the gifts and such were outside of the agreement if there was one.

It amazes ME how a Media Entity such as KRIS TV (NBC) would take the word of a New Yorker without any requirement of documentation or investigation. It is highly irresponsible and unprofessional to advocate for a YUPPIE who was obviously was conspiring to purchase and traffic a human being (a newborn baby).

Now if the girl knew she was not pregnant WATT then?

It is possible she knew all along while she was defrauding those conspiring to commit a criminal act.

Does that make the YUPPIES victims?

Or Criminals?

Another issue would be the entering into a contract with a party of diminished mental capacity.

Hypothetically, if the girl was selling heroin and the Yuppies were giving her "gifts" in good faith as consideration, does her not providing the illegal and illicit drug make the buyers victims?

Bottom Line: If the transaction was illegal the both parties committed felonius acts against the human race.

Of course, according to KRIS TV the mentally diminished Texan victimized the New Yorker YUPPIES.
posted by Jaime Kenedeño at 11:21 PM 0 comments